
Today, December 10th, is day 16 of 16 Days of Activism ; International Human Rights day, an annual reminder of the Declaration of Human Rights and a time to reflect on rights upheld in our communities, and rights that have been breached.
The World Health Organisation has declared a longstanding epidemic of violence against women and girls, which makes International Human Rights Day a significant day to end the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Based Violence. A day for our countries to reflect how endemic violence against women and girls is, understand what keeps women stuck in abusive relationships, and commit to taking just one action to end this abuse.
For Sarah, part of what kept her stuck in her abusive marriage was the beliefs she’d been taught and accepted from childhood, in particular that marriage is for life; marriage vows cannot be broken. While she was being abused Sarah confided in people of faith, including Church leaders, but not until she left did a priest suggest to her that Jamie’s violence broke the marriage contract, and Jamie’s affairs broke the marriage contract. Whatever the rules of the Church, this marriage was over.
Being Catholic meant Sarah would not be able to marry again in the Church unless she had her marriage to Jamie annulled, which requires the cooperation of both husband and wife. Sarah knew Jamie didn’t cooperate in the divorce process; he would never take part a annulment process. This was another weapon of power and control Jamie wielded.
∞∞∞
WITNESS by Kitty Nolan
Chapter 10
Sarah
Sarah went back to school in the new year, telling her head teacher Jamie had left. She was teaching in a Catholic school, and her colleagues were very kind and supportive. One friend offered her ‘rescue remedy’, an herbal remedy for times of distress and overwhelm. Her friend Jean suggested it might help to speak to her parish priest. Her family had had difficulties of their own, and he had been a great help. She said, ‘He’s the least judgmental person I’ve come across.’
Sarah worried about becoming isolated and knew she needed help. Her past experience of the Catholic Church had been patchy. Now, after working for so long in this Catholic school, she was becoming aware of the many changes in the Church over the past few decades, and she felt more comfortable with the Church as it was now. Sarah arranged to meet with Jean’s priest, arriving at the appointment with some trepidation. One of the strongest messages from her childhood had been unworthiness. Jamie had reinforced this, and she didn’t need another messenger conveying her lack of worth now. She worried she might have to jump through hoops to become accepted.
A man, who was about her own age, met her. He wore a sweater – no clerical collar and black suit. Fr Joe offered her tea and sat down with her and listened. She was anxious because she thought he would disapprove of her ending her marriage. She worried he would tell her to reunite with Jamie.
What he said was amazing to her. Hers and Jamie’s was not a true marriage. Jamie’s abuse and affairs had broken the marriage contract, and the only way forward was to separate. He spoke to her about a marriage counselling service and offered to arrange an appointment if she wanted that. Sarah gratefully accepted.
Sarah went on to talk about her isolation and need for community. She was happy working at St Margaret’s and had enjoyed taking part in Mass at school. She now wanted to take part in Mass regularly and bring her children with her. Fr Joe welcomed her, giving her the times of Mass in his parish and in the parish where she lived. She felt going to Mass where she lived would give her children a greater sense of belonging. She wasn’t sure she was ready to go to confession. Would this mean she couldn’t go to communion? He encouraged her go to confession but only when she was ready. He did not feel it was a prerequisite for attending Mass and receiving the Eucharist. She left feeling accepted and arranged to meet with Fr Joe the following week.
Soon, she was meeting with Elaine, a marriage counsellor, who patiently led her to understand the need to look after herself. If she was well, Elaine helped her see, her children would be well. Elaine patiently led her to understand that it was not her fault that Jamie was violent and controlling towards her – the ability to live in peace and safety in your own home was a fundamental human right. Trusting this took Sarah a long time – she believed violence was wrong but wasn’t sure that our society and our faith communities taught this. Elaine listened to her worries about money and the house, work and health, and Erin’s anger and David’s distress. Fr. Joe checked in with her regularly to make sure she was keeping her head above water, emotionally and practically, and asking if there was anything he could do.
Jamie saw the children regularly, often coming to the house. When he left, Erin would become very upset and angry. In the autumn, Andrew, a children’s nurse therapist, began to work with Sarah and the children. Andrew met with Sarah and Jamie and emphasised that it was important to stop using smacking as a form of chastisement. Jamie told him no one could tell him how to bring up his children.
Sometimes when Jamie was visiting the children, Sarah would try to talk to him about the damage he had done. This would end up in another assault on her. At one point, she contacted the Police Family Protection Unit. But the unit was in the early stages of its development, and all the officers could offer was to install cameras in the living room. Jamie would know to avoid them, and any outbursts would take place off camera. Although he and Sarah had split up, Jamie maintained that, as long as they were still married, he had right of access to the family home. Without evidence, Sarah could not get a court order against him. She did not feel safe in her own home. Now when he visited, she left the house.
Sarah began divorce proceedings, but Jamie did not cooperate. When her solicitor sent him a letter, he would ignore it. When asked for information about his finances, he would not give it. When asked to confirm he was now living in a common law relationship with Janice, he would not reply. Eventually, a private detective went to his house and confirmed Jamie’s living situation. This was entered into the record, and friends signed written statements confirming Sarah had talked to them about the beatings. Her solicitor sought divorce on thegrounds of adultery and violence. Jamie continued to take no part in the proceedings, but fifteen months after they split up, a divorce was granted.
In the divorce decree, Sarah was granted Jamie’s share of the house and a financial settlement, and Jamie was deemed liable for the court costs. However, he refused to sign the documents to hand over his share of the house – the sheriff’s clerk had to do this. He said he would provide the financial settlement, with interest, when he retired and he had access to his pension. He did not pay the court costs, and Sarah was told by her solicitor that she would have to pay and then claim the money back from Jamie.
Sarah changed the locks in her house. Jamie no longer had right of access, and she now felt safer.
Over time, Jamie’s behaviour toward Erin and David deteriorated. His partner, Janice, was used to her son Martin, who was happy playing video games and watching television. David was quite different. He preferred to be outside running and climbing. Janice found David hard to deal with and often complained about him. Soon, despite warnings against any physical punishment, Jamie began hitting the children, Martin included, across the head.
Erin became more and more distressed. She was often left in charge of the younger children and felt that, if anything went wrong, she would be held responsible. Then a year later, a new baby boy arrived, which delighted Erin, but she was left on her own to care for him too.
On one occasion, Jamie, Janice, and the kids were out for the day. On the return journey, Jamie and Janice began an argument. It became very heated, and Jamie stopped the car and got out. Janice followed him, leaving the children alone, not knowing where they were or what was happening. Erin was terrified while she looked after her three brothers. When Jamie and Janice came back, she was crying. Jamie complained, saying he didn’t know why she was so upset.
A few months later, Sarah saw Erin flinch whenever Jamie moved his hand. On one occasion, when they were having a meal together, Erin accidentally knocked over her empty milk glass. Jamie leaned over to her and lifted his hand to her face in a threatening way, just short of striking her. Erin’s distress was obvious. Erin loved her daddy but wanted him to stop treating her like this.
They met with Andrew and talked about this. Erin and David agreed that Sarah could talk to Jamie and say he must stop hitting the children. If he didn’t, they would not see him. Sarah checked with her solicitor, who told her that the course of action she’d planned on was right in the eyes of the law.
Sarah arranged for a friend to come to the house to be with the children while she spoke to Jamie. She talked about Erin’s distress and asked him to stop hitting the children. Jamie would not agree. He said again that no one would tell him how to chastise his children. Sarah said there was no option then. He could not see the children.
When Jamie left the room, Sarah thought he was leaving the house. Instead he brought Erin, who by now was eight, and David, six, into the room. He said the children had to decide for themselves who was right. Both children said they wanted their dad to stop hitting them. David said he was worried his dad would get in trouble; a new law that banned smacking children was going through parliament. Jamie said he did not agree with that law, and anyway, it was not law yet.
Jamie left the house that evening and did not see his children again for two and a half years. When they saw their dad again, he told them they were strangers to him. He added that they needed to make the effort to get to know him and the rest of his family. By now, another child had arrived, a girl.
***
Erin and David struggled to maintain a relationship with their dad for the next four years. One evening, they were staying with Jamie. After a row, he grabbed Erin by the neck and dragged her back into his house, breaking her necklace and scratching her neck. David and Martin saw this.
The next day Erin, now seventeen years old, reported what had happened to the police.
A lengthy and detailed investigation began, and Jamie was arrested and charged on seven counts, including one of raping Sarah. The procurator fiscal felt that it would be impossible to achieve a conviction based on the historic nature of the evidence, and court proceedings were stopped. Jamie was referred to his chief constable for internal discipline. He received a deputy chief constable’s warning, the equivalent of a final warning to a civilian employee.
Their decision to go to the police had broken the hold Jamie had over Sarah. A conviction was not secured, but Jamie’s deputy chief constable’s warning meant that Sarah was believed. Although Jamie continued to deny his actions right up to the door of the deputy chief constable’s office, the warning stood.
Sarah was believed, and she was now free to rebuild her life.
∞∞∞
Witness – Sarah
On first thought, the idea of being a witness to my own life might seem odd, but years of mindfulness practice has taught me it’s essential. When I was caught up in the storm of events, planning and reacting, constantly on the go, it was impossible to see another way of being. I realise now that this constant state of crisis and fear of doing wrong, together with the shifting ground beneath me, are all tools of the abuser. For me, the sense of seeking solutions gave me a false sense of control over my life, and perhaps this illusion was part and parcel of the abuse. I loved Jamie and wanted what was best for him. I was committed to Jamie and our marriage, but I had never been committed to myself, not until we split up and I began to rebuild my life. I read a lot about coping with divorce and helping my children cope, and we had reliable professional help, but for several years, my focus was still on solving the problem of Jamie’s discontent in order to help my children cope with their father.
Jamie had a very Victorian approach to marriage and parenthood. No matter how charming and playful he could be, ultimately he wasn’t to be crossed. We had to present ourselves to the world in a way that would reflect well on him. Jamie’s grandmother was from a well-to-do English family that had wealth and property. She married a banker, and their upper middle-class values showed up in Jamie’s family. His mother’s parents were socialist intellectuals, his grandfather, a capable scientist.
I was intellectually bright and came from an Irish Catholic family. My grandfather was a career soldier. When he finished his time in the army, he became the first Catholic overseer in the factory he worked in, indicating he was capable and trustworthy – Catholics in Scotland at the time did not get promotions. My grandmother was an air raid warden during World War II and was very involved in the community. My family members were socialists too, but our approach to our fellow humans was more egalitarian. Jamie displayed a sense of entitlement. He demanded traditional roles and expected the rules to be followed by everyone except himself – a common theme among upper-class Victorian men. His own family humorously suggested he had been born a century too late.
The more I considered Jamie’s confusing approach to our lives, the more I realised there was no way forward if he did not take his commitments seriously. He would intellectualise the inevitability of affairs within marriage and, at the same time, was insanely jealous of me, constantly accusing me of infidelity. Having children to carry on the family line was important, but treating those children with love and respect was outside his capacity.
When I revealed the extent of the abuse we suffered at Jamie’s hands, folk wondered why I stayed – they would not have put up with what I did. The truth, though, is they don’t know. Jamie made me feel overwhelmingly responsible for everything going right in our relationship, and he constantly changed what ‘right’ consisted of. Life has its own momentum, and the day- to-day stuff of earning a living and paying bills, meeting friends and visiting family keeps life turning. Before we know it, years have passed, and we are still trying to make it all work.
Discovering mindfulness practice was fundamental in my path of moving on. In Western philosophy, the concept of right and wrong, blame and punishment are very strong. In mindfulness practice, there is no dualism, no right or wrong, just what is. Blame isn’t uppermost; compassion and understanding are. Embracing all of ourselves leads to compassion for self and others; blame creates a sense of failure and can lead to running away from ourselves or becoming overly responsible for others. Silence and being present with myself was a great place of rest. Letting my thinking be just a thought, and not something I was required to act on was a relief. Folk think mindfulness practice is about stopping thinking. It is, in fact, about observing our thoughts and letting them go. Letting go, therefore, became a possibility.
The years since mine and Jamie’s divorce have been exhausting and liberating, terrifying and the most peaceful I’ve ever had. My life has been focused on my children and their well-being, – I’d learned that my own well-being was fundamental to theirs. Erin and David both have significant health problems resulting from the degree of stress they lived with all their lives, but they have both taken the approach that life is for living and have found their own way as adults – Erin as a holistic therapist and David in the music industry. They both carry their experiences of fear and distress but take the approach that these experiences don’t define them, even if others define them by their experience of abuse. We live in a world of advertising that promotes an illusion of life, not the sweat and tears that are part of reality.
Erin, David, and I suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, which takes its toll. As David grew and became a man, I would find myself panicking as he came down the stairs in the morning because I hadn’t done something I said I would. David wasn’t the least bothered by my forgetting, but for me, I was back with Jamie coming downstairs after a night shift and panicking about the children being noisy or his ironing not being done. Dealing with PTSD requires me to be grounded in the present moment – standing in this kitchen, making this cake, speaking to my son David, not my abusive husband. The energy this requires is huge.
I hoped to find a supportive community at church, but there was little understanding of the reality for us. Erin didn’t settle in the Catholic Church, as much as anything because Jamie belittled it. So we became involved with the local Church of Scotland, which was also difficult. Sometimes I felt like a failure in among the families there, with Mum, Dad, and the children. Mostly, I felt like an outsider, with few people even trying to understand how life was for us. We needed a place where we could be ourselves, bruises and all. We found this is the teaching of Thich Nhat Hahn and the Wild Goose Sangha, a place to practice mindfulness and still stay with our Christian tradition. Eventually, I found church drained me and went less and less frequently.
I was grateful to find a wonderful spiritual director at a retreat centre I often attended for talks. She was the first person I’d met who had read Matthew Fox’s book, Original Blessing, which turns the concept of original sin on its head, citing many theologians who had the same belief. This book helped me greatly in healing my view of myself, and where I stood with God. Theresa, it transpired, had studied with Matthew Fox for two years when she was a young nun. Her approach to spiritual direction was body based, which was just what I needed, given my habit was to be cerebral. I was very aware of how events and interactions affected my body, but I had no idea what to do with how I felt. Between Theresa; Pam, my shiatsu therapist; and mindfulness practice, I now feel more grounded.
Growing up, I had been led to believe life was about getting married and growing a family. By the time I went to college, I knew women could also have a career. Now, we have a situation in which both parents must work in order to make ends meet – to meet the expectations created by advertising and the consumer industry. I have been homeless, and I live on the minimum income the government has decided we need; I don’t go away on holiday and can’t afford new furniture, but I have a rich life and many, varied interests. I am creative both artistically and in writing, and my interest in the well- being of my family and community take precedence over new decoration. I have chronic health problems, which caused me to stop working, but I’ve learned to live with them. I now live at the coast in a place I’d always wanted to live and never thought I would. I am grateful for the many blessings in my life and thankful to have survived the years of abuse.
When we get married, we have no idea what is normal. Our understanding comes from our parents, aunts and uncles, friends and media. We expect to be safe in our own homes and assume everyone is, especially our children. In reality, we don’t talk about the violence husbands and wives visit on each other. We don’t talk about children being physically and sexually abused. In spite of awareness raising and tut- tutting, the overall perception of family life is still a rosy one. And for many it is. But for a huge number of us, it is not. I believe that, unless we talk openly about what constitutes a healthy marriage and empower our young folk to demand it, the prevalence of gender abuse will not change.
Mine is the story of an unhealthy marriage – one I entered with the best of intentions and high hopes. I offer my story to all willing to listen, not as a cautionary tale but as a living witness to an experience shared by millions throughout the world.

Meditation
Mother, when we felt alone and unable to go on, You were there in the friends who comforted us and the games we played together. You were in the doctor and therapists who cared for us and in the solicitor who gave us advice. You were there in the priest who supported us and the sangha who walked with us and the women’s groups that shared our experience. You were there in the peace and quiet of the sea. Thank You
∞∞∞
Follow the links below to get your copy of WITNESS


















